Have you ever gone to
class, planning to engage learners interactively through technology but then realize
you have only one computer and wonder how to go about it? Can one computer be effective
in engaging students to engage in collaborative learning? As a teacher, how
best would you just try not to survive in a one-computer classroom
but instead thrive? These are questions worth reflecting on our teaching
practices, especially considering the teacher – students’ ratio in the Ugandan
classroom contexts. Limited technology in the classroom is a one way to test
the teacher’s innovative and creative abilities. Can the teacher improvise? Can
the teacher devise appropriated mechanisms for the technology to be shared by
learners? This week offered great ideas which directly linked to the ideas of
handling large classes. Even in one-computer classrooms, learning can still be
made interactive and enjoyable. A teacher could use this single computer to give learners group tasks to enter a
summary of their respective groups’ views on a topic before displaying the work
using a projector. The teacher could also use PowerPoint to thrive throughout
the lesson. An article from Education World
provides various strategies that one can use while using a one-computer
classroom. Moreover, in his article Tech
Alternatives for the One Computer Classroom, Richard Byrne suggests
different activities a teacher can use to effectively utilize a single computer
in the classroom.
The core and most controversial
issue is about Learner Autonomy. A teacher, who believes he/she knows it all
and that the learners know nothing at all, will see Learner Autonomy and a
means to make education lose direction. A teacher who is liberal will
understand and embrace learner autonomy because in the end, little can be done
by the teacher regarding intrinsic motivation. The incompetent teacher or the
money-minded teacher will always see learner autonomy as a threat to his job,
thinking that it will become a substitute to his/her profession, which is not
the case. As I read the article Emerging Technologies
Autonomous Language Learning, I got clearer views about learner autonomy.
It is completely different from independent learning. Teaching and learning do
not need to be necessarily teacher centered and not entirely learner
autonomous! There’s need to strike a balance between the two.
Ever thought about
using your mobile phone beyond receiving, making a call and texting? Mobile technology
is one effective and manageable way for a teacher to integrate technology into
his/her classroom as elaborated by Hayo
Reinders. A teacher could use a phone to record audio or visual material,
as well as use it to play music for instructional purposes.
As I wind up, this week
I learned another interesting technology tool, Padlet. This is an online wall
for sharing resources! I will use Facebook wall to explain: There are pages on
Facebook that post information on their walls for their audience. The same is
similar for Padlet except that Padlet is designed for sharing online resources –
articles, videos and links. A teacher can create a class padlet to share resources
for a particular subject or topic!
Overall, this has been
an exceptional week: productive and essential!



Hi Daniel, I had not see your blog before until now. I think you have done a great job posting about different aspecs we have learned during this course. Your reflexion on learner autonomy was very interesting in deed. Keep up the good work .
ReplyDeleteRosben
Hello Daniel
DeleteI totally agree with you, this has been an exceptional week, productive and essential. We have so much information that I feel overwhelm being difficult to say which one is more important because all of them are. What I need is more time to read and write.
I like your comment on learner autonomy, intrinsic motivation and the teacher who thinks knows everything is lost. Your are right, you have explained it very well.
Elizabeth (El Salvador)